Measuring Computer Vision Accuracy on the Warehouse Floor

Published 2026-07-14 by Faraz Rahimi

Office accuracy is a vanity number. Floor accuracy is top-3 hit rate, reject rate, and whether people still open the app on Friday.

Measuring Computer Vision Accuracy on the Warehouse Floor

Tags: Machine Learning, Metrics, Warehouse, Computer Vision, unlisted

I stopped quoting overall accuracy after the first week. A model can be 95% right on easy SKUs and still fail the ten items that cause the radios to go off.

The metrics I keep on a small dashboard: top-1, top-3, explicit reject rate, dwell-confirmed rate, median time-to-result, and weekly active operators.

Stratify by pain

I tag SKUs as easy, lookalike, or unlabelled-known-problem. A drop in lookalike top-3 is an incident. A drop in easy top-1 means preprocessing or a lighting change.

I do not average those together. Averages hide the aisle that is on fire.

Watch abandonment

If people open the camera and leave before results, the tool is too slow or too wrong. That curve is more honest than a confusion matrix you computed on last month's stills.

Original post: https://farazrahimi.com/posts/measuring-computer-vision-accuracy-on-the-warehouse-floor